David Colquhoun agrees with me!

Originally posted at http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/simongates/entry/david_colquhoun_agrees/ on 7 April 2014

On the hazards of significance testing. Part 2: the false discovery rate, or how not to make a fool of yourself with P values


makes much the same points as I have made elsewhere in this blog, though he doesn’t go as far and recommend Bayesian analyses. But I can’t see how you can sensibly interpret p-values without a prior, and if you’re going to go that far, a fully Bayesian analysis is the natural thing to do surely?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s